E8 Markets and Funded Trading Plus both offer crypto funded trading programs, but E8 Markets provides flexible one-, two-, or three-phase challenges with bi-weekly payouts, while Funded Trading Plus typically uses structured multi-stage challenges with defined profit targets, trailing drawdown rules, and scheduled payout windows.
The reader outcome is behavioural: turn this guidance into a repeatable decision without relying on urgency, hindsight or one-off results.
The Behaviour to Practise
Use a written due-diligence checklist before you pay for, recommend or rule out a firm.
Why This Behaviour Matters
Comparison pages are useful only when they improve a decision. A fixed checklist reduces brand bias, prevents one attractive headline from dominating the choice, and makes changing fees or rules easier to verify.
- E8 Markets offers one-, two-, or three-phase challenge structures.
- Funded Trading Plus typically follows a two-phase evaluation model.
- E8 Markets may allow no time limits and no minimum trading days in many plans.
- Funded Trading Plus uses defined profit targets and trailing drawdown rules.
- Fees vary depending on account size and challenge structure.
- E8 Markets often provides bi-weekly payouts, while Funded Trading Plus may follow monthly payout schedules.
- Always review official terms before starting a funded trading challenge.
This article compares E8 Markets and Funded Trading Plus proprietary trading programs for cryptocurrency markets in 2025. The comparison focuses on challenge fees, drawdown and risk rules, and payout policies. E8 Markets provides flexible evaluation options with one-, two-, or three-phase challenges, customizable drawdown limits, and typically faster payout access through bi-weekly withdrawal windows. Funded Trading Plus generally uses a structured two-phase evaluation with fixed profit targets and trailing drawdown limits. Understanding these differences helps crypto traders choose a funded trading program that aligns with their risk tolerance, cost expectations, and trading strategy.
Prop Firm A company that provides capital to traders and shares profits generated from trading activity.
Evaluation / Challenge A testing stage where traders must meet profit targets and risk rules to qualify for funded trading.
Profit Split The percentage of trading profits retained by the trader after the firm’s share.
Drawdown Limit Maximum allowable loss before failing the evaluation or reducing account privileges.
Daily Loss Limit Maximum loss allowed within a single trading day.
Trailing Drawdown A dynamic drawdown level that moves upward as account equity increases.
Phase / Stage A specific segment of the evaluation where traders must meet defined performance targets.
Payout Window Scheduled timeframe during which traders can request withdrawals.
Quick Answer
E8 Markets offers flexible crypto trading challenges with one-phase, two-phase, or three-phase evaluations depending on the chosen plan.
Why it matters
Flexible evaluation options allow traders to choose challenges that align with their experience level and preferred trading pace.
How to do it
- Select an E8 Markets crypto challenge type (e.g., E8 One, Classic, or Track).
- Choose an account size.
- Pay the evaluation fee.
- Trade to reach profit targets while staying within drawdown limits.
- Complete the required phases.
- Activate a funded account and request payouts.
Common mistakes
- Miscalculating drawdown limits
- Ignoring phase-specific profit targets
- Overleveraging during volatile crypto conditions
Example
A trader selects a $100K E8 Markets challenge, targets 8% profit in phase one and 4% in phase two, while respecting daily and overall drawdown limits.
Quick Answer
Funded Trading Plus typically uses two-phase crypto challenges with defined profit targets and trailing drawdown limits.
Why it matters
The structured evaluation process encourages disciplined risk management and consistent performance across both stages.
How to do it
- Choose a Funded Trading Plus crypto challenge size.
- Pay the challenge fee.
- Achieve the phase one profit target.
- Pass phase two under the same risk rules.
- Receive funded account status and access payout eligibility.
Common mistakes
- Rushing phase one with aggressive trades
- Misunderstanding trailing drawdown calculations
- Ignoring risk limits when scaling position sizes
Example
A $50K crypto challenge may require 10% profit in phase one and 5% profit in phase two, with an 8–10% drawdown limit.
Quick Answer
Both E8 Markets and Funded Trading Plus price challenges according to account size and evaluation structure.
Why it matters
Evaluation costs affect the total budget required to become funded.
- Feature — E8 Markets — Funded Trading Plus
- Challenge fee — Varies by challenge type — Fixed per account size
- Reset fee — May apply — May apply
- Refund policy — Sometimes available after passing — Depends on plan
- Account sizes — Multiple tiers — Multiple tiers
Example
An E8 Markets $25K challenge may cost around $129, while a similar Funded Trading Plus challenge may cost around $149.
Quick Answer
E8 Markets typically offers flexible drawdown ranges and daily loss limits, while Funded Trading Plus often uses fixed trailing drawdown caps.
Why it matters
Risk frameworks determine how traders size positions and manage volatility.
- Risk Rule — E8 Markets — Funded Trading Plus
- Daily loss limit — Often around 4–5% — Usually defined per phase
- Overall drawdown — Around 6–14% depending on plan — Around 8–10%
- Trailing drawdown — Sometimes optional — Often used
- Time limits — Often none — May apply
Example
An E8 Markets $50K account might allow 4% daily and 8% total drawdown, while a Funded Trading Plus challenge may enforce a fixed 8% trailing drawdown.
Quick Answer
E8 Markets typically offers bi-weekly payouts with early withdrawal eligibility, while Funded Trading Plus often uses scheduled monthly payout windows.
Why it matters
Payout timing affects trader cash flow and capital management.
- Feature — E8 Markets — Funded Trading Plus
- First payout — Often after ~8 days — Usually after meeting payout window
- Frequency — Bi-weekly — Often monthly
- Profit split — Up to ~100% depending on plan — Up to ~100% depending on plan
Example
A trader funded with E8 Markets may request bi-weekly payouts, while Funded Trading Plus may allow withdrawals during scheduled payout periods.
Quick Answer
Choose E8 Markets for flexible challenge structures and faster payout access, and choose Funded Trading Plus for structured multi-stage evaluations and fixed drawdown rules.
Why it matters
Different trading styles perform better under different rule frameworks.
Consider E8 Markets if you want
- Flexible evaluation structures
- Faster payout cycles
- No strict time limits
Consider Funded Trading Plus if you want
- Clear multi-phase objectives
- Fixed drawdown limits
- Structured evaluation rules
Example
A crypto trader who prefers faster payouts and flexible rules may choose E8 Markets, while someone who prefers defined targets and structured phases may select Funded Trading Plus.
- Review official challenge rules for both firms
- Compare evaluation fees by account size
- Understand profit targets for each phase
- Learn daily and overall drawdown definitions
- Plan risk management strategy before trading
- Practice on demo accounts first
- Track equity drawdown during trading
- Check payout windows and minimum withdrawal amounts
- Confirm supported crypto pairs and trading platforms
- Verify refund policies after passing evaluations
Is E8 Markets more flexible than Funded Trading Plus?
Yes, E8 Markets offers several challenge structures and often fewer restrictions on trading timeframes.
Which platform pays out faster?
E8 Markets often allows bi-weekly payouts, while Funded Trading Plus may follow monthly payout windows.
Are profit splits similar?
Both firms may offer profit splits up to around 100% depending on the plan.
Can traders trade multiple cryptocurrencies?
Both programs typically support several crypto instruments, though available assets vary.
Are challenge fees refundable?
Some programs offer refunds after passing, but policies differ by provider.
Are there hidden fees?
Always review platform terms for reset fees, withdrawal fees, or network costs.
Is one challenge easier to pass?
Difficulty depends on the trader’s strategy and ability to follow risk rules.
Can accounts scale over time?
Some programs offer scaling plans for profitable traders.
This article is educational only and does not constitute financial advice. Proprietary trading programs carry risk, including potential loss of evaluation fees or funded capital. Always review official program documentation and risk disclosures before participating.
Recognise the Trigger
- Trigger: You feel ready to choose a firm after seeing one attractive fee, payout split or promotional claim.
- Automatic response: Buy immediately or compare firms from memory.
- Coached response: Pause, verify the current official terms, score the same decision criteria for every firm, and record the date checked.
- Stop condition: Do not proceed when a decisive rule, restriction, fee or payout condition is unclear.
How to Practise the Behaviour
- Write the non-negotiable rules that fit your strategy and market.
- Verify each material claim on the firm’s current official website or terms.
- Compare total cost, drawdown method, trading restrictions, payout conditions and support.
- Score each option using the same criteria; do not change the weighting midway.
- Wait until the next day, review the evidence again, and then decide.
Worked Example
A trader reviewing e8 markets vs funded trading plus (crypto): fees, drawdown rules, and payouts compared (2025) notices the trigger before acting. Instead of making an immediate decision, the trader follows the written steps, records the evidence and accepts a no-trade or no-purchase outcome when a required condition is missing. The coaching win is following the process; one profitable or unprofitable result does not prove the rule works.
Common Mistakes and Reset
- Changing the rule after seeing the outcome. Reset by returning to the version written before the decision.
- Treating confidence as evidence. Reset by naming the observable condition that is present or absent.
- Increasing risk to recover time or money. Reset by applying the pre-agreed limit or ending the session.
After a mistake, do not try to repair the outcome with another impulsive action. Record the trigger, step away, and resume only when the checklist and risk conditions are valid again.
Self-Coaching Questions
- What exactly triggered the decision?
- Which observable evidence supported the action?
- Did I respect the risk limit and stop condition?
- What is the one behaviour I will repeat or reset next time?
Sources & Further Reading
- FTMO’s official Trading Objectives — Defines the current objectives and loss limits that must be checked before evaluating an FTMO programme.
- Topstep’s official Trading Combine parameters — Explains the current objectives, loss limit, consistency target and account parameters for Topstep evaluations.
- NFA BASIC registration and disciplinary checks — Shows how to verify US derivatives firms and review regulatory or disciplinary history.
- CFTC’s checks before trading leveraged forex — Provides independent guidance on leverage, counterparties, withdrawals and registration.
- FCA guidance on contracts for difference providers — Sets out risk warnings and retail protections relevant when assessing leveraged trading offers.
Now Practise This Behaviour
Immediate exercise: use the next 10 minutes to complete this practice loop.
- Write the trigger for this behaviour in one sentence.
- Write the coached response and the condition that means stop.
- Apply the rule to one recent chart, decision or firm comparison.
- Record whether you followed the process, without scoring the financial outcome.
Open the 60-Day Challenge Ready
Now practise this behaviour.
